The Yamuna riverbed in Delhi is a blue curly ribbon spread in an almost north-south direction
over a length of some 52 km and a maximum width of 3 km. Covering some 9,700 ha,
it is popularly called as Zone O (River Zone) in Delhi Development Authority’s (DDA)
planning divisions of the city.
Bounded by
the Ring Road on its West and the Eastern Marginal Bund (popularly called the
NOIDA link road) in the east, the Zone O is well marked on the city’s map and
in people’s minds. The entire Zone O (which is a much-reduced version of its
original spread) incidentally goes under deep floodwaters whenever Yamuna
chooses to flood, which is quite often. Notable floods have been seen in 1924,
1947, 1964, 1977, 1978, 1995, 1998, 2010, 2013 and 2019. There are seven
road bridges, four rail and metro bridges across the river in the city.
Developmental
pressures saw riverbed eyed by various developmental authorities from time to
time. First came the power plants that not only occupied space and diverted
portion of the river’s water but also dumped their fly ash onto its banks. When
the Tibetan refugees first came, they occupied a portion of the river’s west
bank and stayed put. Still, till the mid-1990s the onslaught onto the river
floodplain was restricted and limited to the west bank which had an elevation higher
than the east bank. But with the coming of the Metro in late 1990s, all hell
broke loose and it was as if the river bed was up for grabs.
Soon after
the Metro station and the depot at Shastri Park, now in the east bank came the
Akshardham in early 2000. The latter was vehemently opposed by the local
farmers and legally challenged at the Supreme Court but in vain. Finally, when
in mid-2000, another Metro depot and the Commonwealth Games came to be planned, the civil society rose in opposition and a Yamuna Satyagrah
followed by a petition at the Delhi High Court brought the question of
importance and sanctity of Yamuna floodplains for the city to the fore.
Ultimately the Lt Governor of Delhi was obliged in 2007 to impose a moratorium
on any new construction in Zone O.
While the
said moratorium stemmed to some extent the tide of developmental plans aimed at
the Yamuna floodplains, it was finally a judgment in 2015 of the National Green
Tribunal (NGT) that decisively sent a clear message that the river floodplain
was not on offer anymore. Delivered after an extended adjudication spread over
three years (2012-2015) during which some 20,000 truckloads of debris dumped
in the floodplains were physically removed. It is a comprehensive judgment that
has gone into various aspects of river rejuvenation with time-bound directives
for the various agencies involved.
Named the
‘Maili se Nirmal Yamuna’, the 100-page judgment prohibited any construction in
the floodplain. It also mandated an expert committee to prepare a restoration plan
for the river floodplains and the said restoration plan was directed to become
an integral part of the judgment. It was the brazen violation of this judgment
and the provisions of the restoration plan that brought the planned World
Cultural Festival in 2016 by the Art of Living foundation into a legal contestation
and the imposition of a Rs 5 crore environmental compensation levied on it by
the green court.
It is in
this context that the now planned elevated road parallel to the Ring Road bang
in the riverbed close to the active river water edge is to be seen.
Proposed by
the Public Works Department (PWD) of the government of National Capital
Territory (NCT) of Delhi, this 22 km long elevated road is meant to decongest
the existing Ring Road. Without contesting the need or not of the said road it
is a matter of deep concern when developmental agencies seem to view the
floodplain as an available piece of unused land awaiting development? Moreover,
such a road is not a part of the restoration plan prepared by the experts, which
is currently under implementation by the DDA.
In the words of celebrated Australian author D. Mussared (1997):
“Floodplains are as important to rivers as bark is to trees. Most of the processes that drive life in rivers happen around their edges. Just as the sap flows through the outermost ring of a tree, not through its centre, the lifeblood of river ebbs and flows on its floodplains. The vegetation growing there isn’t mere decoration; it’s a river’s roots and leaves.”
It is a sad commentary when city planners are still not able to appreciate the eco-sensitive nature of the river floodplains in the city and are ready to further devastate it in form of a 22 km road that shall not only play havoc, during its construction phase with the integrity of the floodplains, but also leave behind an eyesore standing bang in the river like a serpentine hump?
The key objections to this plan, in addition to it
being in the teeth of the NGT judgment and the floodplain restoration plan,
include an awful lack of public consultation, an obvious lack of options
assessment and an open disdain for the integrity of the floodplains.
Even a rudimentary options assessment with
avoidance of floodplains as an objective would have preferred the said elevated
road going right above the existing ring road as a number of Metro corridors
currently, do within the city.
The worst fear is that once approved and in place,
the said road shall set an avoidable precedence whereby more and more similar
corridors shall be planned to criss-cross the floodplains like an overbearing
matrix.
One of the issues deserving urgent attention is a
lack of legal protection available to our floodplains which makes such plans
easy game. It is thus suggested that the Yamuna floodplains in Delhi be given
either an eco-sensitive status under the Environment Protection Act or a
wildlife protected status under the Wildlife Protection Act.
Whatever, unless stopped in its tracks such and
other plans in due course might even convert the Zone ‘O’ of the city into a
Zone ‘Zero’. God forbid!
Manoj Misra is a former forest officer and the convener
of the ‘Yamuna Jiye Abhiyaan’ (Living Yamuna Campaign), a civil society
consortium.
(Views are
personal)
Read Also: Don’t just blame the farmers